“On closed loop transient response system identification”
Authors: Christer Dalen and David Di Ruscio,Affiliation: University of South-Eastern Norway
Reference: 2016, Vol 37, No 4, pp. 213-223.
Keywords: unstable systems, closed loop, step response, system identification, indirect, non-parametric, transient response, pipeline-riser
Abstract: Some methods for transient closed loop step response system identification presented in the literature are reviewed. Interestingly some errors in a method published in the early 80's where propagated into a recently published method. These methods are reviewed and some improved methods are suggested and presented. The methods are compared against each other on some closed loop system examples, e.g. a well pipeline-riser severe-slugging flow regime example, using Monte Carlo simulations for comparison of the methods.
PDF (897 Kb)
DOI: 10.4173/mic.2016.4.2DOI forward links to this article:
| [1] Tuomo Lindh and Niko Nevaranta (2020), doi:10.1109/ETFA46521.2020.9211945 |
[1] Anti-slug control solutions based on identified model. (2015). Anti-slug control solutions based on identified model, Journal of Process Control. 30(0):58 -- 68. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.12.007
[2] Courbot, A. (1996). Courbot, A, Prevention of Severe Slugging in the Dunbar 16' Multiphase Pipeline. Proc. Annual Offshore Tech. Conf.. doi:10.4043/8196-MS
[3] DiRuscio, D. (1996). DiRuscio, D, Combined Deterministic and Stochastic System Identification and Realization: DSR - A Subspace Approach Based on Observations. Modeling, Identification and Control. 17(3):193--230. doi:10.4173/mic.1996.3.3
[4] DiRuscio, D. (2009). DiRuscio, D, Closed and Open Loop Subspace System Identification of the Kalman Filter. Modeling, Identification and Control. 30(2):71--86. doi:10.4173/mic.2009.2.3
[5] Hapoglu, H., Balas, C.E., and Wardle, A.P. (1998). Hapoglu, H, , Balas, C.E., and Wardle, A.P. Self-tuning and conventional control of an industrial scale packed distillation column. Tr. J. of Engineering and Environmental Sciences. 22:1--8. http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/engineering/issues/muh-98-22-1/muh-22-1-1-95065.pdf, .
[6] Haugen, F. (2012). Haugen, F, The Good Gain method for simple experimental tuning of PI controllers. Modeling, Identification and Control. 33(4):141--152. doi:10.4173/mic.2012.4.3
[7] Jutan, A. and Rodriguez, E. (1984). Jutan, A, and Rodriguez, E. Extension of a New Method for On-Line Controller Tuning. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 62(6):802--807. doi:10.1002/cjce.5450620610
[8] Ljung, L. (1998). Ljung, L, System Identification: Theory for the User. Pearson Education. doi:10.1002/047134608X.W1046
[9] Soderstrom, T. and Stoica, P. (1989). Soderstrom, T, and Stoica, P. System Identification. Prentice Hall. .
[10] Taiwo, O. (1993). Taiwo, O, Comparison of four methods of on-line identification and controller tuning. IEE Proceedings D - Control Theory and Applications. 140(5):323--327. doi:10.1049/ip-d.1993.0043
[11] vande Vusse, J. (1962). vande Vusse, J, A new model for the stirred tank reactor. Chemical Engineering Science. 17(7):507 -- 521. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(62)87002-X
[12] Yuwana, M. and Seborg, D.E. (1982). Yuwana, M, and Seborg, D.E. A New Method for Online Controller Tuning. AIChE Journal. 28(3):434--440. doi:10.1002/aic.690280311
BibTeX:
@article{MIC-2016-4-2,
title={{On closed loop transient response system identification}},
author={Dalen, Christer and Di Ruscio, David},
journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
volume={37},
number={4},
pages={213--223},
year={2016},
doi={10.4173/mic.2016.4.2},
publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}
};