“Errors-in-variables and validation problems in reaction norm predictions for wild populations”
Authors: Rolf Ergon,Affiliation: University of South-Eastern Norway
Reference: 2025, Vol 46, No 1, pp. 13-33.
Keywords: Environmental drivers, errors-in-variables problems, prediction error method, reaction norm predictions, reaction norm validation, reference environment
Abstract: Studies of phenotypic responses in wild populations are often based on reaction norm models where the environmental drivers in many cases are related to climate change. Such input signals will never be exactly known, and there will always be measurement errors also in the recorded responses. In parameter estimation these errors give rise to errors-in-variables problems, especially in the form of overfitting caused by errors in the input measurements. A second important feature of such phenotypic response problems is that the environmental inputs must be given appropriate but largely unknown reference values. A third problem is that it is difficult to find good validation methods for predicted responses. Essential aspects of these problems are here studied by use of a reaction norm model in its simplest univariate form, characterized by a mean intercept value and a mean plasticity slope value, and the overall conclusion is that validated disentanglement of plasticity and genetic adaptation based on realistically short data for wild populations is a difficult task. In a proposed validation method, the available input-output data is split into one part for modeling and one part for validation, and the feasibility of this approach is studied in simulations with use of a prediction error method, which is essentially a maximum likelihood method. It is also argued that validation of a chosen or estimated reference environment in practice is impossible when the data comes from the (unintended) anthropogenic global warming experiment, where no independent experimental data exists. When the evolution is slow because of small genetic variances, overlapping generations and long lifetimes, or because of near optimal adaptive plasticity, the best quantitative genetics option may be to assume a constant plasticity slope value, equal to the initial value. It turns out to be easy to estimate this value, but that should be done without setting other unknown parameter values to zero. This option is appealing also because it removes the dependence of a guessed or estimated reference environment.
PDF (965 Kb)
DOI: 10.4173/mic.2025.1.2References:
[1] Arnold, P.A., Kruuk, L.E., and Nicotra, A.B. (2019). How to analyse plant phenotypic plasticity in response to a changing climate, New Phytologist. 222(3):1235--1241. doi:10.1111/nph.15656
[2] Bonamour, S., Chevin, L.-M., Charmantier, A., and Teplitsky, C. (2019). Phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change: the importance of cue variation, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 374:20180178. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0178
[3] Ergon, R. (2019). Quantitative genetics state-space modeling of phenotypic plasticity and evolution, Modeling, Identification and Control. 40:51--69. doi:10.4173/mic.2019.1.5
[4] Ergon, R. (2022). The important choice of reference environment in microevolutionary climate response predictions, Ecology and Evolution. 12(4):e8836. doi:10.1002/ece3.8836
[5] Ergon, R. (2023). Dynamical blup modeling of reaction norm evolution, accommodating changing environments, overlapping generations, and multivariate data, Ecology and Evolution, 2023. 13:e10194. doi:10.1002/ece3.10194
[6] Ergon, R. (2023). Microevolutionary system identification and climate response predictions by use of blup prediction error method, Identification and Control, 2023. 44(3):83--110. doi:10.4173/mic.2023.3.1
[7] J., S., Daly, C., Foster, S., Ashcroft, M., and Warton, D. (2015). A climate of uncertainty: accounting for error in climate variables for species distribution models, Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6:412--423. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12217
[8] Kangas, A. (1998). Effect of errors-in-variables on coefficients of a growth model and on prediction of growth, Forest Ecology and Management. 102:203--212.
[9] Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry, Evolution. pages 402--416. doi:10.2307/2407630
[10] Lande, R. (2009). Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation, Journal of evolutionary biology. 22(7):1435--1446. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01754.x
[11] Ljung, L. (1999). System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[12] Ljung, L. (2010). Perspectives on system identification, Annual Reviews in Control. 34(1):1--12. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2009.12.001
[13] Merila, J. and Hendry, A.P. (2014). Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence, Evolutionary applications. 7(1):1--14. doi:10.1111/eva.12137
[14] Morrissey, M., Kruuk, L., and Wilson, A. (2010). The danger of applying the breeder's equation in observational studies of natural populations, J. Evol. Biol.. 23:2277--2288. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02084.x
[15] Price, G.R. etal. (1970). Selection and covariance, Nature. 227:520--521.
[16] Réale, D., McAdam, A., Boutin, S., and Berteaux, D. (2003). Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change, Proc. Royal Soc. Lond.. 270:591--596. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2224
[17] Söderström, T. (2019). A user perspective on errors-in-variables methods in system identification, Control Engineering Practice. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.05.013
[18] Tarka, M., B., H., and Hasselquist, D. (2015). Selection and evolutionary potential of spring arrival phenology in males and females of a migratory songbird, J. Evol. Biol.. 28:1024--1038. doi:10.1111/jeb.12638
[19] Tredennick, A., Hooker, G., Ellner, S., and Adler, P. (2021). A practical guide to selecting models for exploration, inference, and prediction in ecology, Ecology. 102(6):e03336.
[20] Valdés, A., Arnold, P., and Ehrlén, J. (2023). Spring temperature drives phenotypic selection on plasticity of flowering time, Proc. R. Soc. B. 290:20230670. doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.0670
BibTeX:
@article{MIC-2025-1-2,
title={{Errors-in-variables and validation problems in reaction norm predictions for wild populations}},
author={Ergon, Rolf},
journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
volume={46},
number={1},
pages={13--33},
year={2025},
doi={10.4173/mic.2025.1.2},
publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}
};